Blumenthal Asks Senate to Reject Bernanke Re-Nomination

Richard Blumenthal and John Dankosky in the Where We Live studio - photo Chion Wolf

by John Dankosky - Speaking on WNPR’s Where We Live, Connecticut Attorney General – and Senate candidate -Richard Blumenthal is asking senators to reject the re-nomination of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.  That Senate vote, once said to be a slam-dunk, is now in question. Blumenthal said that he’s doing this “somewhat regretfully” because of Bernanke’s “economic expertise, and his past involvement in crisis, which has been positive.”  Here’s some of what Blumenthal had to say:

“I give him credit for many good decisions, but I think that his current tack needs to be changed.  And that we need to send a message to our nation that we’re done with the kind of laxity toward Wall Street that has been tolerated for much too long.”
“I have immense respect for Chairman Bernanke, but my my feeling is that we need some new leadership at the federal reserve.  He has opposed some of the financial regulatory reforms that the President himself has supported.  I have supported creating a consumer finance protection agency that would, in effect, provide safeguards for consumers against some of the deceptive and risky loans that again, were at the core of our economic problems and the meltdown that occured.  The chairman has opposed a number of reforms that I feel are necessary.  And, he has also failed to take action so far against the spiraling increases in fees and charges, sometimes on people who pay in full, on time, with their credit card.  And these increases in the credit card rates, I think are unconscionable and unacceptable.  I’ve written not only to the banks, but to him, and so far, he’s failed to act. I think we need new leadership at the federal reserve.”
Blumenthal said that “we need someone with a different view” of the regulation of Wall Street, but admitted it might not be easy to find that candidate.
“The chairmen of the federal reserve have come from the culture and profession that really  embodies Wall Street.  And Wall Street can do many great things…provide exchanges where people’s money can buy stock in good companies, and they can provide liquidity to the nation’s financial system, and talent to run our corporations.  But the kind of bailouts that we gave, and the lack of sufficient oversight against the bonuses, and  some of the now repeated excesses I think is something that the federal reserve has to be held accountable for doing.”
He said that because he’s “not running for President” he wouldn’t presume to make a list of possible contenders for the job.  Blumenthal also said that his actions weren’t about “blame going backward,” but instead were meant to be about a step forward in regulating the financial services industry, reigning in credit card abuses, and cracking down on big bonuses given out by the banks.
“We need someone in the federal reserve who shares the kind of outrage that I think American people feel about the way things are going in this country.”

10 Comments

Filed under Economics, Federal Government, Politics

10 Responses to Blumenthal Asks Senate to Reject Bernanke Re-Nomination

  1. EndTheFed

    Elizabeth Warren is my TOP contender!

  2. Bill Mainor

    Warren Buffett says Bernanke should be reappointed. Blumenthal says no. I’ll go with Buffett.

  3. Chris Dominick

    This coming from a man who laughably tried to sue Wall Street New York residents from

    SEE the YOU TUBE Interview with the AG
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goNw7cu1G3g

    and lost a $24.5 million emminent domain suit in 2009. Coakley x’s 10

  4. James D

    In the interview, Mr. Blumenthal also came out in full support of our war in Afghanistan. For many CT progressives, that’s very disappointing….

    • jdankosky

      James -
      FYI – Monday’s show is with Jim Himes. He’s just back from Afghanistan, and I’m very interested in getting his first-hand thoughts. Happy to ask any questions of him you’d like…
      jd

      • James D

        John,

        Great!

        Some questions:

        1) Under the Obama plan and comments from his senior staff (Clinton, Gates), we actually leave only when the Afghan army can “step up.” But by all informed accounts, the Afghan army may be at least a decade away from competence. In a word, it’s a disaster. Consider this account from “Stars and Stripes” last month:

        “Even the best Afghan units lack training, discipline and adequate reinforcements. In one new unit in Baghlan Province, soldiers have been found cowering ditches rather than fight. Others routinely steal U.S.-supplied fuel, equipment and weapons. And a few are suspected of collaborating with the Taliban against the Americans…”

        “They don’t have the basics, so they lay down,” said Capt. Michael Bell, who is one of a team of U.S. and Hungarian mentors tasked with making this young kandak battle-ready. “I ran around for an hour trying to get them to shoot, getting fired on. I couldn’t get them to shoot their weapons.”

        “Douthwaite, the logistics officer, said he was threatened twice after he began trying to control the steady pilfering of U.S.-supplied fuel.”

        at:
        http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=66544

        In that light, how we can we rationally base our military/political strategy on a hand-off to an Afghan Army that rivals the Keystone Cops – and has not been trainable? Will US troops ever be able to leave?

        2. The Taliban can sustain itself indefinitely, according to a December 22, 2009 briefing by Major General Michael Flynn, the top U.S. intelligence officer in Afghanistan. He wrote, “The Taliban retains [the] required partnerships to sustain support, fuel legitimacy and bolster capacity.”

        At: http://www.defensestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/isaf-state-of-the-insurgency-231000-dec.pdf

        If that is true, why are we wasting billions of taxpayer dollars in Afghanistan — money that could be used to create jobs in the US and turn our economy around?

        3. In November of last year Afghan President Hamid Karzai made a public plea to the United States to engage in direct negotiations with the Taliban leadership. In an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, Karzai said there is an “urgent need” for negotiations with the Taliban, and made it clear that the Obama administration had opposed such talks.

        At:
        http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/06/right-after-interviewing-karzai/

        Why hasn’t the President responded to this plea for peace? Will you publicly urge him to do so?

        Take care!

    • Martha H

      Worse, he talked about “pre-emptive” actions against suspected “terrorists” in any other county.

  5. Pingback: Himes “Leans” Toward Support for Obama’s Afghanistan Strategy «

  6. Pingback: Republicans Weigh in on Bernanke «

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s